U.S. Law Enforcement Obtaining Warrants to Search Facebook Profiles
Wednesday, 13 July 2011 08:40
Jeremy Farmer
NEW YORK – U.S. law-enforcement agencies are increasingly obtaining warrants to search Facebook, often gaining detailed access to users' accounts without their knowledge.
A Reuters review of the Westlaw legal database shows that since 2008, federal judges have authorized at least two dozen warrants to search individuals' Facebook accounts. Many of the warrants requested a laundry list of personal data such as messages, status updates, links to videos and photographs, calendars of future and past events, "Wall postings" and "rejected Friend requests."
Last Updated on Wednesday, 13 July 2011 08:45
Read more...
|
America Has Become A Nothing More Than A Police State
Tuesday, 12 July 2011 18:27
Jeremy Farmer
Since President Nixon declared war on drugs 37 years ago there has been a steady slaughter of innocent citizens due to mistaken drug raids conducted by heavily armed gangs of police amped up on their own adrenaline. The latest is the case of a 26 year-old ex-Marine, Jose Guerena, who had served two tours of duty in Iraq. He was shot to death in his Tucson home last month during a drug raid by a police swat team.
The ex-marine had reacted to the home invasion as many would--to protect his family he reached for his gun. The police shot him multiple times as his wife and two-year-old son hid in a closet. He was left to bleed to death, as police refused to call paramedics until an hour after the shooting. His gun was found to be set on safety. He had not fired a round. No illegal drugs were found in his house. As of this writing, the Pima County police have yet to provide an explanation for this "legal" homicide.
Read more...
Standing Up To Unwarranted Police Power
Tuesday, 05 July 2011 16:45
Jeremy Farmer
Justice Ginsburg's Dissent Underscores Her Importance to American Law.
What's wrong with the police kicking in the door of an apartment after they smell marijuana drifting from it, if they knock hard, announce who they are and then hear what sounds like evidence being destroyed?
Some lower courts have said the answer is pretty much everything, because the police themselves created the pretext for barging in. But the Supreme Court ruled last week that such a warrantless search does not necessarily violate the Fourth Amendment, according to a vague new standard for determining whether the police violated the protection against unreasonable search, or threatened to do so.
Read more...
|
How The Patriot Act Is Being Used To Fight The Drug War
Tuesday, 12 July 2011 18:15
Jeremy Farmer
The Constitutional "Precedent" Set by the Patriot Act Appears to Be Serving to Accelerate the Rapid Disintegration of Civil Liberties in This Country
With the stroke of an autopen, the once articulate critic of the Patriot Act signed a four year extension of the most dangerous assault on American civil liberties in US history without a single additional privacy protection.
One would think that this reauthorization would have incited vigorous debate in the halls of Congress and at least a fraction of the breathless 24/7 media coverage allotted the Anthony Weiner "sexting" scandal. Instead, three weeks ago the House ( 250 to 153 ) and Senate ( 72 to 23 ) approved, and the President signed, an extension of this landmark attack on the Bill of Rights with little notice and even less debate.
Most disturbing was the extension - without modification - of the Act's three most controversial provisions:
Read more...
Door-busting gets easier
Tuesday, 05 July 2011 16:44
Jeremy Farmer
The Orange County Register
The next time police knock at your door, be careful what you do next. Any sound you make inside could grant police the authority to search your home without a warrant.
That's the result of last week's misguided Supreme Court decision expanding the definition of an exigent circumstance under which police can conduct a warrantless search. In an 8-1 ruling, the court created a new precedent that grants law enforcement the power to bypass a warrant based on arbitrary standards, which could be as minimal as “hearing” evidence being destroyed. We strongly disagree with the court because, in the words of dissenting Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, it “arms the police with a way routinely to dishonor the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement.”
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 13 |